Sales Excellence
Sales management · situational judgement · see the full Sales Excellence suite

Sales Manager Effectiveness — Situational JudgementYour best-paid seller beats quota every year. She also has the highest churn and two pressure complaints.

Twenty-two situational-judgement scenarios on the decisions a first-line sales manager of eight to twelve sellers actually owns: territory reallocation, carrying a struggling rep, protecting a top performer's time, and the seller who makes number while damaging customers. Partial credit, four competencies, banded.

45 minutesEvidence-keyed scoringGlobal · INR & USD

The decisions a manager owns, not the ones a seller does

A seller with the largest book on the team has let three accounts go uncontacted for a quarter and does not want any taken away because his plan pays on the whole book; a seller at 54 per cent with six weeks left is running the biggest opportunity of the quarter and the customer has gone quiet; you have six hours a week of coaching time, one seller at 48 per cent and four between 85 and 100 with fixable gaps; your top earner has the highest first-year churn, two written pressure complaints and a habit of promising dates delivery cannot meet. Twenty-two scenarios, each with four things a manager might do.

Options are scored on a 0–3 gradient with a written reason for every score. Distractors are the reflexes of a manager under quarterly pressure: reallocate and inform afterwards so it is not a negotiation, set an activity target and leave the book intact, wait for the annual reset. Showing the seller the coverage data, agreeing what he can genuinely service and reallocating the rest with commission bridged scores full credit for a reason the rationale states. Options that reward a dishonest close, conceal a problem from the manager's own leadership, or penalise a seller for reporting honestly score zero. The bank is original; no branded sales management methodology is used or implied.

Four competencies are banded separately — Territory and Coverage Decisions, Building Team Capability, Performance Management, and Conduct and Customer Standards — because a manager who allocates territory well may still spend all six coaching hours on the seller who is failing, or protect a top earner whose conduct is costing the customer base. The AI-personalised narrative names the pattern across your 22 answers, the growth plan starts from the weakest competency, and the scenario review explains every option.

Four competencies, scored from the items tagged to each:
Territory & Coverage DecisionsBuilding Team CapabilityPerformance ManagementConduct & Customer Standards

What you walk away with

Four management competencies on one radar

Territory and Coverage Decisions, Building Team Capability, Performance Management, and Conduct and Customer Standards plotted together, so a director promoting a seller into management sees the shape of their judgement before the team does.

Banded interpretation for each competency

Each returns Emerging, Developing, Strong or Exceptional with a coaching note describing what that band produces in a real team — the coaching hours spent on the wrong seller, the conduct problem tolerated because the number is good.

Your management reflex, named

The strengths and development panel is generated from your own answers and describes the tendency — deciding then informing, managing activity instead of coverage, protecting the top earner — in the words a director would use in a calibration.

Overall score, pass mark and every scenario explained

A 0–100 score with a band and a 70 per cent pass mark for promotion and hiring decisions, then all 22 scenarios reviewed with the reasoning behind each option, including which options scored zero for concealing a problem from your own director.

Inside your report

Illustrative sample — your report is generated from your own responses.

Competency radar
TerritoryBuilding Team CapabilityPerformance ManagementConduct

Every competency this test declares, scored from the items tagged to it — so the shape is yours, not a template.

Overall score
64Strong
EmergingDevelopingStrongExceptional

One number, one band, and a two-sentence summary of what the band means for you — then the breakdown that explains it.

Strengths and development areas
Lean on
Territory & Coverage Decisions76
Performance Management64
Work on
Conduct & Customer Standards47
Building Team Capability58
A personalised narrative reads the pattern across all of them — where a strength is masking a gap, and which single improvement moves the overall score most.

Built for

  • First-line sales managers running teams of eight to twelve sellers
  • Senior sellers being considered for, or newly promoted into, a sales management role
  • Sales directors making promotion decisions on evidence rather than on quota history
  • Training providers building a sales management programme around measured gaps

Your team will experience your management judgement before you have finished forming it.

Twenty-two scenarios in 45 minutes, four competencies banded, growth plan and full scenario review delivered on completion.

₹499 (incl. GST) · assessment and full report, nothing further to pay

Buy this assessment

No account needed to buy. Your name and email identify the purchase and Razorpay sends your receipt to that address.

Secure Razorpay payment · ₹499 includes 18% GST

Bought this already and lost the tab? Sign in and enter your purchase code under Claim a purchase on your dashboard.

Secure checkout · INR & USDFull report immediately after submission

Frequently asked questions

What does the Sales Manager Effectiveness assessment measure?

The judgement a first-line sales manager exercises over decisions only a manager owns: reallocating territory and coverage, building the team's capability with limited coaching time, managing performance including the struggling rep and the deal that may need to move, and holding conduct and customer standards when the seller breaking them is the top earner. Four competencies across 22 scenarios. It is for current first-line managers, sellers being considered for promotion, and the directors deciding.

How is it scored, and does protecting the quarter score well?

Only when it is also right for the team and the customer. Each option is scored on a 0–3 gradient with a written reason; options are length-matched and the best answer moves position. Options that reward a dishonest close, conceal a problem from the manager's own leadership, or penalise a seller for reporting a deal honestly score zero. Reallocating accounts and telling the seller afterwards earns partial credit; agreeing the reallocation with data and bridging commission earns full.

How long is it and what does the report include?

Forty-five minutes for 22 scenarios in one sitting. The report is immediate: an overall score with band against a 70 per cent pass mark, a radar and banded bars across the four competencies with coaching interpretations, an AI-personalised narrative of strengths and development areas, a growth plan built from your weakest competency, and a review of every scenario with the reasoning behind each option. Everything is included; there is nothing further to unlock.

How should a sales director use it in a promotion decision?

As evidence beside the quota record, not instead of it. A top seller's Conduct and Customer Standards band tells you something their number does not. At the promotion interview, use the scenario about six coaching hours as a case and ask how the candidate would spend them; compare the answer with their Building Team Capability band. For new managers, the growth plan is the first-quarter development agenda and a retake at twelve months shows movement.

Does it apply outside India, and how is it priced?

Yes. The scenarios are country-neutral, names are fictional and the decisions — coverage against commission, coaching time against need, conduct against quota — are the ones every first-line sales manager makes in any market. No branded sales management methodology is referenced. The assessment is priced in INR and USD, with the live price in both currencies shown on this page.

One of 29 Sales Excellence assessments

Foundation, core selling, specialist and sales-leadership bands — every one an original situational-judgement bank with weighted partial credit, a stated reason for every option, and ethics scored to zero on a mis-sell. Hire with the band that matches the role, or develop with the one that matches the gap.

See every sales assessment

Methodology: Original AssessAll situational-judgement item bank for first-line sales management, authored to the AssessAll Scientific Item-Authoring Standard: behavioural-tendency framing, misconception-anchored distractors, weighted partial-credit keys with a 0-3 gradient, and option-length parity control. Scenarios are country-neutral and describe management behaviour generically; no proprietary or trademarked sales methodology is referenced or implied. Options that reward a dishonest close, conceal a problem from the manager's own leadership, or penalise a seller for reporting a deal honestly are keyed at zero. Not affiliated with or derived from any third-party instrument.