Logical Reasoning — GraduateTwenty-five puzzles with exactly one derivable answer — stating the rule beats guessing it.
Number and letter series, analogies, syllogisms, blood relations, directions, seating, symbol substitution, calendars and counting: 25 multiple-choice items in 22 minutes, calculator-free. Scored on Logical Reasoning and Cognitive Speed & Agility, with every rule explained in the item review.
Graduate logical reasoning built to reward the rule, not the hunch
The series items ask for the next term in a sequence whose differences themselves follow a pattern. The relation items give you a statement such as someone pointing at a photograph and describing a relative through two links, and ask who that person is. Calendar items tell you which weekday a date falls on and ask about a later date in the month. Add odd-one-out sets, syllogisms with two premises, seating arrangements and symbol-operator swaps, and you have the full spread of formats a graduate aptitude round draws on, each with one answer that can be derived rather than felt.
The 25-item bank is original and follows international graduate reasoning-test conventions. The deduction items deliberately include the classic invalid inference — affirming the consequent — keyed to sound logic, so a candidate who reasons from the conclusion backwards is caught. Option lengths are parity-controlled so that answer length carries no signal, and every key has been checked so that only one option is derivable. The bank is not affiliated with any third-party instrument.
Twenty-two minutes for 25 items means pace matters, and the report separates it from accuracy: Logical Reasoning and Cognitive Speed & Agility are scored from their own tagged items and banded with a coaching interpretation each. All 25 items come back reviewed with the rule stated — the difference pattern, the family tree, the weekday arithmetic — so a candidate preparing for placement season learns the method behind each miss, and a hiring team can see whether a low score is slow or wrong.
What you walk away with
Logical Reasoning and Cognitive Speed & Agility are banded independently with a coaching interpretation each. A candidate who solves everything they reach but reaches too few gets a different read from one who finishes fast and guesses, which matters for both preparation and shortlisting.
The 0–100 overall score and its band — Emerging, Developing, Strong, Exceptional — give a hiring team a consistent line across a graduate pool, without the test pretending to a pass mark it does not have.
Each item is reviewed with your choice, the key and the rule that produces it. For series, that is the pattern; for relations, the chain of links; for syllogisms, why the tempting inference is invalid. It is the study guide most practice sets never provide.
Strengths and development areas are drawn from your own responses, and the plan targets whichever of reasoning or speed scored lower — with practice pointed at the specific item families you missed rather than a generic drill list.
What comes back
Illustrative sample — your report is generated from your own responses.
Band edges at 40, 60 and 80. Each band carries its own coaching interpretation for that competency.
Every competency this test declares, scored from the items tagged to it — so the shape is yours, not a template.
Assembled from your lowest competencies, in order — not a generic checklist.
Built for
- Final-year students and recent graduates preparing for campus placement aptitude rounds
- Hiring teams running volume graduate screening who need a consistent reasoning read
- Candidates for analyst, operations and trainee roles with a logical-reasoning stage
- Anyone who wants to learn the rule behind the puzzle types they keep getting wrong
Placement rounds do not explain your wrong answers. This report does.
Twenty-five items in 22 minutes, then every rule written out for you.
Take free · full report ₹150 (incl. GST)
Frequently asked questions
Twenty-five multiple-choice items across the formats graduate aptitude rounds use: number and letter series, analogies, syllogisms and formal deduction, blood relations, directions, seating and ranking, symbol-operator substitution, calendar and counting puzzles. It scores two competencies — Logical Reasoning and Cognitive Speed & Agility — and suits final-year students, recent graduates and hiring teams screening analyst, operations and trainee applicants.
Not on this one. Every item has exactly one derivable answer, option lengths are controlled so the longest choice is no likelier to be right, and the deduction items include the classic invalid inference — affirming the consequent — keyed so that reasoning backwards from the conclusion is marked wrong. Candidates who can state the rule outscore candidates who guess, which is precisely the difference the test is built to detect.
Twenty-two minutes for 25 items, no calculator, on any device. The report is generated immediately: an overall 0–100 score with a band, banded bars for both competencies with coaching interpretations, a two-competency radar, a personalised narrative, strengths and development areas, a growth plan and a question-by-question review with the rule for every item. Everything is included at the listed price; there is nothing further to unlock.
Read the item review first. Misses tend to cluster — calendar arithmetic, say, or two-premise syllogisms — and the review names the rule for each, so you know which families to drill. Follow the growth plan for the weaker competency, then retake to see whether the band moves. Hiring teams use the same review in interview to ask a candidate to walk through a reasoning item they missed.
Yes. The item formats follow international graduate reasoning-test conventions, the names and settings are neutral, and no local knowledge is needed. It is priced in INR and USD, with the live price for each shown on this page, so a graduate applying abroad or a hiring team recruiting across countries can use one test and one report format for the whole pool.
Numerical, verbal, logical, abstract, spatial, data and workplace-judgment banks — each an original item bank with every rule stated in the explanation, scored per competency and reported with a banded profile and a growth plan. Sit one, or build a battery from several.
See the aptitude catalogue →Methodology: Original AssessAll item bank following international graduate reasoning-test conventions (series, deduction, spatial-verbal puzzles). Includes classic invalid-inference traps (affirming the consequent) keyed to sound logic. Option lengths are parity-controlled so answer length carries no signal. Not affiliated with any third-party instrument.