Business Case AnalysisThree cafés, a support desk and a gym: read the case, find the one number that matters, make the move.
Business Case Analysis measures whether a manager can read a situation accurately, compute the figure the decision turns on and then choose the best move. Four original short cases, 14 items in 30 minutes — 10 keyed calculations and 4 situational calls graded on defensibility. Two banded competencies, full item review.
Four cases, each ending in a decision you have to defend
A café chain runs three outlets at different margins with a loss-making site whose landlord offers a kiosk conversion, and you must compute total operating profit after head-office costs before judging the offer. A support desk faces a volume surge and a vendor promising a throughput lift, with pilot evidence from a firm whose tickets were simpler — how many hires does the software really save? A gym's sales head projects sign-ups for a discount month while a rival discounts too; the numbers roughly break even and the argument is about launching chain-wide. Each case feeds several questions, so a misread early costs you later.
All four cases and every figure are original constructions written for this test; no third-party case material is adapted. Each computational key is verified by a worked derivation and the distractors are the figures you reach by missing one line — omitting head-office costs, applying the throughput lift to the wrong base. The four situational items are graded on a defensibility gradient rather than one key: a sound but second-best move earns partial credit, and the explanation says why the top option is stronger and what evidence would change the ranking. Nothing rewards the boldest-sounding option.
The report scores Critical Thinking and Workplace Judgment separately, because reading the case accurately and choosing well are different skills and managers fail on either. Both are banded from Emerging to Exceptional with coaching interpretations, and the AI-written narrative describes how you handled the movement from number to decision. The question-by-question review carries the worked derivation for every calculation and the reasoning behind every judgement ranking; the growth plan prioritises whichever of the two competencies sits lower.
What you walk away with
Critical Thinking covers whether you read the case and computed the right figure; Workplace Judgment covers the move you then chose. Two banded bars show whether your weakness is analysis or action — most managers assume one and have the other.
Each of the ten calculations is shown line by line in the review — outlet margins summed, head-office costs deducted, throughput lifts applied to the right base — so a missed number becomes a visible missing step rather than a mystery.
For the four decision items you see how every option was graded and why: what the best move protects, what the second-best gives away, and which piece of evidence in the case the weak options ignored. Defensibility is made explicit.
The AI-written narrative reads across the cases to describe your decision habits — anchoring on the sales projection, discounting the rival, skipping the fixed cost — and the plan prioritises the lower competency with concrete next steps.
The report, in three panels
Illustrative sample — your report is generated from your own responses.
Every competency this test declares, scored from the items tagged to it — so the shape is yours, not a template.
Assembled from your lowest competencies, in order — not a generic checklist.
Built for
- Team leads through general managers who make everyday commercial and operational calls
- Candidates for management-trainee, consulting and business-analyst roles with a case round
- Hiring panels wanting a timed, scored case exercise before the case interview
- Owner-managers who want to check how they move from a set of figures to a decision
Managers are rarely wrong on the arithmetic alone — they skip the line that mattered.
Four cases, 14 items, 30 minutes — every figure derived and every decision ranking explained.
Take free · full report ₹150 (incl. GST)
Frequently asked questions
It measures three linked abilities: reading a business situation accurately, computing the one figure the decision turns on, and choosing the best move given imperfect information. Four original short cases — a café chain, a support desk, a gym and a follow-on decision — produce 14 items in 30 minutes. It is built for team leads through general managers, management trainees and analysts facing a case round, and for panels screening them.
Ten items are calculations with one verified key, where each distractor is the figure you reach by missing one line of the case. Four are situational decisions graded on a defensibility gradient: the best move earns full credit, a sound alternative earns partial credit, and options that ignore evidence in the case score zero. Bold-sounding options carry no bonus. Scores roll into two banded competencies and an overall 0–100 score. The bands describe where you stand, not a cut-off.
Thirty minutes for 14 items across four cases, in one sitting. The report is generated immediately from your responses: overall banded score, radar and banded bars for Critical Thinking and Workplace Judgment with coaching interpretations, an AI-written narrative, strengths and development areas, a prioritised growth plan and a question-by-question review with worked derivations and judgement rankings explained. Nothing further to unlock.
Read the derivations for every missed figure and note the line you skipped — it is usually the same kind of line each time. Study the ranking explanations for the judgement items to see what evidence you discounted. Hiring panels use the two bands to separate analysts who read well from those who decide well, and bring one of the cases into the interview as a live discussion of the candidate's own answers.
Yes. The businesses — cafés, support desks, gyms — and the logic of margin, capacity and discount are the same anywhere; only the currency symbol is local, and every calculation is proportional. The situational items rest on general management practice rather than any national convention, and bands are descriptive rather than normed. The test is priced in INR and USD, with the live price shown on this page.
Numerical, verbal, logical, abstract, spatial, data and workplace-judgment banks — each an original item bank with every rule stated in the explanation, scored per competency and reported with a banded profile and a growth plan. Sit one, or build a battery from several.
See the aptitude catalogue →Methodology: All four cases and every figure are original AssessAll constructs written for this test; no third-party case material. Each computational key is verified by a worked derivation.