Business English & Email EffectivenessEmails that get the decision, not the reply-all — 22 questions on writing that moves work forward.
Business English & Email Effectiveness measures whether the English you write gets results: subject lines that carry the ask, openings that state the point, bad news, professional disagreement, register with senior readers and the usages global correspondence rewrites. 22 items, 20 minutes, two banded competencies.
Not grammar for its own sake — writing judged by its effect
You must tell a client a deliverable is three days late, and the question is which opening line to use: the warm-but-empty pleasantry, the apology buried in formal fog, the vague reference to a previous call, or the sentence that states the subject in one line. Another item hands you a bloated hedge — a possibility that we may perhaps need to reschedule — and asks for the concise professional rewrite. Others test the connective that fits, what a bare FYI signals to a reader, how to disagree with a finance director without either caving or bristling, and how to follow up twice without passive aggression.
The bank is original and aligned to international professional-communication conventions, including the regional usages — do the needful, revert, prepone, discussed about — that global correspondence flags and rewrites. Option lengths are parity-controlled, so the best answer is never simply the longest or the most formal. Every explanation states the principle behind the key: decision-first structure, time-bound acknowledgement, register matched to reader, one ask per message. Distractors are the habits real professionals fall into, not cartoon errors, so the review reads as coaching rather than correction.
The report scores two competencies — Verbal Reasoning & Comprehension and Workplace Judgment — because effective email is half language and half knowing what the reader needs. Each is banded from Emerging to Exceptional with a coaching interpretation, and the AI-written narrative says which side is your constraint. The question-by-question review shows every item with the principle explained, and the growth plan turns the misses into a short list of writing habits to change this week.
What you walk away with
Verbal Reasoning & Comprehension and Workplace Judgment are banded separately. Some writers have the grammar and miss the reader; others read the room and fumble the sentence. The two bars tell you which you are, and the fix differs.
Every item in the review names the principle behind the key — state the point first, time-bound the acknowledgement, match register to the reader — so you leave with rules that transfer to tomorrow's email rather than one corrected sentence.
Where you chose a usage that international correspondence rewrites, the explanation shows the global-English equivalent and why it lands better with a reader in another country, without treating the local form as a mistake in itself.
Built from your lower competency, the plan lists concrete habits — subject lines that carry the ask, openings that state the decision, one request per message — plus an AI-written narrative describing the writer your answers reveal.
Inside your report
Illustrative sample — your report is generated from your own responses.
Band edges at 40, 60 and 80. Each band carries its own coaching interpretation for that competency.
Assembled from your lowest competencies, in order — not a generic checklist.
Built for
- Professionals who write to clients, vendors or senior stakeholders in English every day
- Candidates for client-facing, account management, consulting and shared-services roles
- Hiring teams screening roles where a badly pitched email costs a relationship
- Indian and other non-native professionals moving into global correspondence
A late-delivery email is read once, and the first line decides how it lands.
Twenty-two items in 20 minutes, each explained by the writing principle behind it.
Take free · full report ₹150 (incl. GST)
Frequently asked questions
Whether the English you write achieves what it is sent to achieve. Twenty-two items cover subject lines that carry the request, openings that state the point, decision-first structure, delivering bad news, disagreeing professionally, following up without passive aggression, register with senior readers, and regional usages that global correspondence rewrites. It is for professionals who write to clients, vendors and stakeholders, and for the teams that hire them.
No. Option lengths are parity-controlled and the most formal option is often a distractor — formality that buries the point is one of the habits being measured. Each item has one keyed answer with the principle stated in its explanation. Answers roll into two banded competencies, Verbal Reasoning & Comprehension and Workplace Judgment, and an overall 0–100 score with a band. The bands describe your current writing, not a cut-off.
Twenty minutes for 22 items in one sitting. The report is generated immediately from your responses: overall banded score, radar and banded bars for the two competencies with a coaching interpretation each, an AI-written narrative, strengths and development areas, a prioritised growth plan, and a question-by-question review with the writing principle behind every key. The price includes the full report; nothing further to unlock.
Individuals take the growth plan's habits into their next week of email — one ask per message, point first, time-bound acknowledgements — and retake after a month to see the band move. Managers use the report as a development conversation for team members moving into client-facing work. Hiring teams use the two bands as a consistent screen for roles where written English carries the relationship.
Yes. The principles — structure, register, concision, clarity of ask — are those of international business English, and the regional-usage items are explained rather than penalised for their origin, so the test suits professionals in any market writing to readers in another. Bands are descriptive rather than tied to a national reference group. The test is priced in INR and USD, with the live price shown on this page.
Numerical, verbal, logical, abstract, spatial, data and workplace-judgment banks — each an original item bank with every rule stated in the explanation, scored per competency and reported with a banded profile and a growth plan. Sit one, or build a battery from several.
See the aptitude catalogue →Methodology: Original AssessAll item bank on business-correspondence effectiveness, aligned to international professional-communication conventions. Option lengths parity-controlled. Not affiliated with any third-party instrument.