Behavioural Profile
Behavioural profile · four-domain emotional intelligence · browse the behavioural profiles

Emotional Intelligence ProfileWhen a stakeholder dismisses three weeks of your work in one sentence, what you do next is the profile.

A workplace emotional-intelligence profile across four domains — self-awareness, self-management, social awareness and relationship management. Thirty-two rated statements map your habits; eight scenarios test them under pressure. You receive a Low / Mid / High band per domain with behavioural interpretations.

25 minutesEvidence-keyed scoringGlobal · INR & USD

Rated statements tell you what you believe; scenarios show what you do

The forty items split into two kinds. Thirty-two rated statements ask how you typically notice, name and regulate your own reactions and read other people's, and how you behave when relationships get strained. Eight scenarios then put you in the moments where emotional intelligence is actually tested: a senior stakeholder waves away weeks of work and moves on, a peer sends a two-line email telling you to redo a correct analysis, you spot your own error mid-presentation before the client does, your manager credits you in public for a junior colleague's idea while that colleague sits at the table. Twelve to fifteen minutes, within a twenty-five-minute limit.

The four-domain framework is drawn from published work on emotional intelligence and used here as a conceptual scaffold; every statement and scenario is original, written for Indian professional settings, and not derived from or validated against any commercial inventory. The rated section has no right answers and is not scored correct or incorrect. The scenario options are all plausible responses a reasonable professional might choose, and each is keyed to the domain it most reflects rather than to a single approved answer, so the profile reflects a tendency rather than a score to beat.

The report reads each domain band in workplace terms — what a Low self-management band looks like in a heated review, how a High social-awareness band can coexist with a Low relationship-management band in someone who reads the room perfectly and still says the wrong thing — and then sets the scenario responses beside the self-ratings so you can see where your view of yourself and your in-the-moment choices agree or diverge. A strengths and watch-points panel and a short set of practice habits per domain follow, written for use in a coaching or one-to-one conversation.

What you walk away with

A Low / Mid / High band on each of four domains

Self-awareness, self-management, social awareness and relationship management, each placed in a band from eight rated statements and two scenarios. The report treats bands as descriptions of current habit, not as a grade — there is no ranking against other people and no threshold to reach.

Self-ratings and scenario choices, compared

The eight scenarios sit alongside the thirty-two rated statements so you can see where what you believe about yourself matches what you chose under pressure, and where it does not. Most people find one domain where the two disagree, and that gap is usually the most useful line in the report.

Behavioural interpretations for Indian workplaces

Each band is explained through the situations it shows up in — the review call, the terse email, the public credit that belongs to someone else — with attention to how seniority, hierarchy and indirectness in Indian offices shape what emotionally intelligent behaviour actually looks like in the moment.

Practice habits per domain

A short growth rail of habits matched to your bands: a naming routine for a Low self-awareness band, a pause protocol for a Low self-management band, a listening practice for social awareness, a repair conversation for relationship management. Small enough to start this week, specific enough to notice.

The profile, in three panels

Illustrative sample — your profile is generated from your own responses.

Strengths and development areas
Lean on
Accuracy76
Judgement64
Work on
Speed58
Judgement64
A personalised narrative reads the pattern across all of them — where a strength is masking a gap, and which single improvement moves the overall score most.
Trait bands — no pass mark
AccuracyHigh
SpeedMid
JudgementMid
LowMidHigh

Each band carries a plain-language interpretation of how that tendency shows up at work — and what it costs and buys.

Prioritised growth plan
1
Speed
Two concrete actions for the next fortnight, drawn from this competency's lowest-scoring items.
2
Judgement
A practice routine and what 'better' would look like on a retake.
3
Accuracy
One habit to protect what is already working while the first two move.

Assembled from your lowest competencies, in order — not a generic checklist.

Built for

  • Professionals moving into client-facing, cross-functional or people-managing roles for the first time
  • Team members who receive feedback about tone, reactions or reading the room and want a concrete map
  • Managers and coaches who want a shared, non-judgemental language for emotional habits in one-to-ones
  • HR and L&D teams adding emotional intelligence to development programmes and leadership pipelines

The terse email is coming. Know how you will answer it before it lands.

Forty items in twelve to fifteen minutes, and a four-domain profile that compares what you believe with what you chose.

Take free · full report ₹199 (incl. GST)

Secure checkout · INR & USDFull report immediately after submission

Frequently asked questions

What does the Emotional Intelligence Profile measure and who should take it?

It measures four domains — self-awareness, self-management, social awareness and relationship management — through thirty-two rated statements and eight workplace scenarios, and returns a Low / Mid / High band per domain with behavioural interpretations. It is for professionals stepping into client-facing or people-managing roles, anyone who has received feedback about tone or reactions, and managers, coaches and L&D teams who want a concrete, shared language for emotional habits at work.

How is the profile scored, and can I just pick the mature-sounding answers?

The rated statements are not scored right or wrong; they place each domain in a band. The scenarios offer options that are all plausible, each keyed to the domain it most reflects, so there is no single approved answer to spot. Because the report compares your self-ratings with your scenario choices, presenting yourself favourably in one section tends to show up as a gap against the other — which the report points out.

How long is it and what is included in the result?

Twelve to fifteen minutes for most people, within a twenty-five-minute limit. The full profile is available immediately: four banded domains with workplace interpretations, a comparison of self-ratings against scenario choices, a strengths and watch-points panel and a short rail of practice habits matched to your bands. Everything is included and there is nothing further to unlock.

Can I use the report for development, coaching or a retake?

Yes. The habits rail is written for a coaching or one-to-one conversation, and the domain interpretations give managers non-judgemental language for feedback about reactions and tone. Because the profile describes habits rather than fixed traits, a retake after three to six months of deliberate practice can show movement, particularly in self-management and relationship management where habits change fastest.

Is it relevant outside India, and in which currencies is it sold?

The four-domain framework is international and the scenarios — a dismissive stakeholder, a curt email, a misattributed idea — happen in every office. The items are set in Indian professional life and pay attention to hierarchy and indirectness, which makes them sharper for Indian teams and still readable anywhere. The assessment is priced in INR and USD, with the live price shown on this page.

One of the AssessAll behavioural profiles

Profiles describe how you tend to work rather than how well — there is no pass mark and no ranking. Each uses an original item set built on an established trait framework and reports banded traits with plain-language interpretations of what each band means at work.

See the profiles →

Methodology: Based on the four-domain model of emotional intelligence described in Daniel Goleman's published work, used here as a conceptual framework. All items and scenarios are original works authored for AssessAll for the Indian working context. This instrument is not affiliated with, derived from, or validated against any commercial emotional-intelligence inventory.